Observations
Observations and loose thoughts.
Last updated
Observations and loose thoughts.
Last updated
Reflection Pings
More to come!
I'd like to begin sketching out some ideas by exploring the following upstream question:
What might you need from Pings in order for them to be useful?
A Ping needs to be able to transport you back to the "place" /moment it emerged within so that you can explore and uncover the meaning it might hold for you
There need to be many different ways you can arrive back to Pings so that you can:
Increase the likelihood you might serendipitously/unintentionally happen upon a Ping that's meaningful to you
Triangulate your way back to Pings you don't remember the precise location of
A Ping needs to help you evaluate the extent to which you can depend/rely on it.
Said another way: you need to know how "safe" it is to run/embody/apply a Ping in practice.
A Ping needs to remind you of you.
You need to feel safe iterating upon a Ping as it's meaning evolves over time.
Holding all of the above in mind, some ideas come to mind for what properties may end up comprising the Ping format we can not yet clearly see:
Capture date
Capture time
Capture location
Unique ID
Visit count
Visit log (day, time, etc.)
Number of replies (if any)
Medium
Resonance count
Time elapsed since capture
Relationship to notable events/moments
Edit history
Time elapsed since last visit
Size
Places that reference this Ping
Ideally, "places" could include artifacts internal and external to Ping Practice app.
Time spent composing initial Ping
Cumulative time spent visiting Ping
Time of last edit
Total number of edits (human / bot)
Average time between visits
Average visits per day/week/month
i. In this moment, I'm intentionally scoping this question to the app and excluding other contexts in which people might be capturing what – in this universe – are calling "Pings."
ii. E.g. Instagram, Twitter, camera roll, TikTok, etc.
The notion of "zooming" immediately resonated, both in terms of the interface/navigation and this question of, "How does Ping Practice inspire you to reliably translate these discrete 'captures' into wisdom?" This second bit led me to wonder, "Might zoom in the Ping Practice Universe refer to compression?" "Compression" in the sense that Ping Practice is driving you to create tiny artifacts, broadly defined, that are . In this way, they can quickly help you identify the context you are present within, arrive into it, and .
The diagram above is a first pass at bringing some visual shape to the above. Next time, I'd like to walk through some actual examples to evaluate the extent to which this way of thinking reflects/describes what I've experinece with Ping Practice.
I'm feeling inspired by the prospect of a potential artifact that can serve as a dynamic/ever-, the primitives for which could be Moments/Events, Phases/Periods, and Cycles/Loops. More on those another time.
In this moment, I could see this "frame of reference" containing the following:
Fatherhood: an incrementing counter of the number of days it's been since Leila was born
Parent's visit: a decrementing counter of the number of days left until my parent depart for home.
Leila's age: some kind of bounded block of time that gives some rough shape to what Leila is likely experiencing. E.g. development leaps she's going through, what she's likely to be needing in any given moment.
In thinking about the artifact(s) Ping Practice could inspire and empower you to make, new language surfaced for what I notice myself needing. I sense the questions that follow could eventually inform the "shape" of these yet-to-be-named artifacts...
Might I be more present and accepting of how I’m feeling if I can easily reference the "features" of the present moment (e.g. responsibilities, interactions, choices, etc.) that have been impacting me?
Might I be able to more effectively embody an intention if it’s bounded/related to a phase/period of time that I've named?
Ping Practice is meant to help you become clear about what's meaningful to you and make that meaning memorable enough to embody.
This topic feels quite big to me. To start, I'm thinking I'll review the meaningful and memorable Pings I've created over time.
Every so often, . I know I'm encountering a Ping of this sort when its emergence causes a flood of other Pings to surface or collect within it. Sometimes, these Pings have the effect of making movement clear in a context that I'd previously felt stuck within.
In my mind is the image of a natural dam giving way and with it, water flowing freely through – what had previously been – a constricted waterway.
Beyond these Pings' power to unblock and generate new thoughts, they tend to be durable, relevant to the broader I find myself within. In hindsight, these Pings also tend to be memorable. They can quickly bring me back into the moment they served me within...they can demarcate time.
The power and durability of these Pings leads me to wonder:
How – if at all – might the interface inspire you to converge on "notable" Pings?
Where – if at all – might the interface afford space for "notable" Pings to gather?
Revisting: consistently experiencing instinct to "go back"; current ability to explore feels limited
Artifacts: neding affordance(s) to inspire me to create intentions
Look back through "meta" pings
Natalia and I talking led to me sharing my screen with her and scrolling back through Airtable, showing what's pinged for me recently.
While doing so, I noticed myself feeling at ease and grateful. Both by the content of the pings I was revisiting and the space this friend has generously opened for me to do so.
I also noticed this act prompted Natalia and I to talk about what we were both seeing. That part felt especially nourishing and inspiring to me.
I'm coming to find that what I need to be reminded of is dynamic; it varies day-by-day. And yet, I'm still not yet feeling like the "🟢 Active" view inspires me to revisit and reprogram it at a commensurate cadence.
With this context in mind, an idea emerged this past weekend (30 June): I set an intention for a defined period of time:
This worked for me! I remembered the intention and for the most part, embodied it.
The success of this little experiment brought me back to think about "🟢 Active" and wondering whether the pings within it ought to be bounded by time in some way. I feel like I'd rather arrive in active and there be nothing there than arrive there and the contents feel stale. I worry that in the latter scenario, the value of the view itself starts to degrade over time. I also wonder how the view might feel more delightful, more inspiring...I want to arrive in "🟢 Active" and feel pulled to touch things, move things, "pick things up," etc.
Woah, this morning (Sunday) as I was revisiting the pings I've sent over the past week I learned about the "Automation" functionality Airtable offers.
To start, I've set up an automation that will send me an email me each morning with a list of the pings within the "🟢 Active" view. This view is filled with the pings I've said I'd like to remember / keep top of mind.
Say more
I continue to love having the ability to "say more" about a ping that speaks to me as I'm going back and revisiting.
Earlier today, I happened upon a ping about a new potential are.na channel and immediately felt compelled to start using Airtable's commenting feature to start drafting a potential description for the yet-to-be created channel. A little bit of movement and progress made possible by the tool I needed in that very moment being close by!
When I open Airtable in low-intent moments to browse through past pings, I notice myself gravitating towards shorter entries and quickly bypassing longer ones.
I wonder if this pattern could be explained, in part, by how little attention I feel motivated to expend in these in-between moments and how quickly something needs to grab my attention for me to become engaged.
I want to tidy these notes up...
instinct to archive "..reliably produce coherent structure" (bit of language I resonated with and have since used)
adding comment to contextualize a quick ping "urgency instilled"
amazing how quickly i can remember the moments these thoughts emerged within. reminds me of the bit about forgetting:
i'd like to see what's resonated with me over time
i'd like to be able to turn a ping into a timer
maybe there's an activity feed?
another way to find your way back
something about the idea of "bumping" something to the top (actually, maybe it's a "resonance" view sorted from highest to lowest?)
Today, I added a button that, when clicked, increments an integer within the newly-added Resonance count field by one.
I'm thinking this could be an effective way for my present self to say something to the effect of, "Hey, you seem to be curious about this." to my future self. A future self that could be wondering, "What has been connecting/resonating with you lately?"
While it feels important to me that interface present information/cues without being too opinionated about what – if any – action you take in response, I can immediately see the answer to the above being helpful for deciding what you might consider sketching a guide/tool for.
Unfortunately, Airtable does not support scripts, and by extension the ✚ button on mobile :/
🟢 Active View and JigsOkay! Something is connecting and I'd like to try to map it out...
Naming the above feels notable. Reason: in coming to realize this impact, I think I'm also starting to see the factors that may be contributing this slight behavior change emerging:
I'm revisiting 🟢 Active often.
In revisiting, I'm engaging with/"picking up"/thinking/considering what's there. Said another way, when I'm in 🟢 Active , I'm active! I'm asking myself questions like, "Is this card still relevant? How might I make this language more memorable? What picture/video might illustrate the essence of this card?"
Put simply, I think "1." and "2." are causing these cards, and the messages they represent, to remain present in my mind when I'm out in the world, away from this interface.
Resulting questions
Ok! Two adjustments tonight that I feel energized about...
I added an ID field to the Airtable base and exposed it on cards in the 🟢 Active view. This field will get automatically populated each time a new record is added.
I added a field that will enable me to link records together.
When I combine the following three things:
The two adjustments above
The language shift from 📍Pinned to 🟢 Active,
The assumptions that I'll continue regularly revisiting the "🟢 Active"view
... I can start to see a future where:
I'm able to recall the IDs of cards that are important/meaningful to me at any given time from memory.
I'm revisiting, referencing, refining, and expanding these cards more often and by extension, they're becoming more meaningful.
I find myself needing some extra support as I move into creating public doorways into this project (I'm thinking about a conversational video format to start. E.g. TikTok or Instagram Reels).
To provide that support, I'm going to experiment with doing the following:
Creating a thread to "host" / "hold" the conversation about this voice I find myself wanting to use
Marking this thread as 🟢Active so that it's easy for me to revisit.
Associating a picture with this thread so that it's more memorable and easier for me to arrive into the mindset it's asking me to.
Using Airtable's native Commenting feature to hold any thoughts that may emerge in the future. Note: this one feels notable in so far as it's the first time I'm branching out from Twitter as the sold mode of composing.
I jotted down – what felt like – a bunch of thoughts in my Drop Journal this past week. On Sunday (30 April), I sat down at my computer to try to make some sense of them ahead of the week I'm currently in.
In doing the above, I was wanting to revisit the specific things I'd been thinking about. More specifically, I was wanting to arrive back in the headspace those thoughts emerged within. Seeing everything together in a moment where I felt like I had the space and energy to think was wonderful.
The connection I'm drawing here between the experience I had on Sunday and the experience Obi shared with me some months ago feels fresh and notable to me. I think it's because I'm starting to see a more visceral connections between these contexts/applications: improvisation and bringing together/readying the "raw material" to do so.
The reflection/observation above is leading me to see a potential way through the blockage I've felt posting more publicly...
What if I act like Obi does:
Book "studio sessions" for myself. As in: I'll commit to making something to share at a specific time and place for some bounded period of time.
In the time between each "improve sessions" I'll log all the ideas that surface to me in a consistent place.
When I arrive at the "studio" I'll "swipe through" the ideas that I've accrued through "2." and act on one that speaks to me.
I'm starting to use the "Pin" field I set up yesterday which in turn inspired me to add an image today. Cool!
Aside: I wonder if it might be interesting to call – what I'd previosuly been referring to as "Favorites" – simply "Active"...at least by default. Keep it simple, generic, and uncomplicated by people bringing existing meaning and expectation(s) to the word.
Added a "Pin" field that I'm thinking I can use to mark and quickly return to thoughts I want to more easily revisit.
Woah!
Now that I've got this dashboard set up, I'm immediately curious to see how - if at all – this view provides me a lens through which to look at, and engage with, this Ping Practice.
Discovering that Airtable makes it possible to associate an image with a record (or in this context, a Ping), is helping me to imagine a new potential choice to consider when revisiting: looking out for Pings that feel especially resonant so that I can consider elevating them in some way (e.g. associating an image, or other types of media) to deepen/enhance/extend the meaning/message of the Ping and my ability to remember that meaning/message.
Note: the above was prompted by me experimenting with setting up a "Dashboard" for the base I set up in Airtable. In doing so, I thought "Oh, it might be interesting to visualize how many Pings I've 'Favorited'."
"Hmm, what to do now?" I thought and then realized, "Oh, I've "pinged" (trying out this language) about this before."
I then went to Notion to search for pronoun which quickly returned what I've said in the past about possessive pronouns and ultimately helped me arrive at the language I needed!
Before Monday, I would've gone directly to Twitter to attempt the search above which past experiences have led me to doubt whether that search would return the Tweets I'm fairly certain existed.
Observe during the Ping Practice (0.1) experiment.
In response, I created a new view within Notion that enables me to easily .
On Saturday, I was making coffee and I wanted to "capture" the sound of the coffee dripping down from the V60 cone into the coffee that had already accumulated in the caraffe atop which the V60 rested.
I've noticed this happen a few times: what prompts me to start recording a voice memo ends up not being what I end up spending the majority of the momo talking about.
Right now, I see two bits of information in the pattern above:
I feel comfortable talking [aloud] with myself. It feels natural to me. Once I get going, I do not seem to have difficulty knowing "where to go" next and/or how to go about getting there and ultimately "landing" the note.
It was the kind of moment where I felt like I was brought back to an activity [i] that I thought I had figured out the meaning and inner-workings of.
Although upon revisiting this activity, I noticed something new that led me to think something like, "Hold on...not so fast. I don't have this figured out. I think there's a lot more here than I initially thought."
Later, when I returned to my laptop to flesh out this facet, again, I reached for writing. Then, noticing the time (21:40), I thought, "It's getting late and I've got other things I want to do, why don't I just record a voice memo and come back to this another time."
"Is it the medium?" I asked myself.
Although, having arrived here and explore this question a bit I'm coming to wonder whether the differentiator in this moment was time...the amount of time I invested thinking about the facet I was motivated to explore. That voice memo is 2 minutes and 59 seconds long. That's not a lot of time to think, regardless of the medium I'm using to think with and through.
--- i. In this case, drafting a prompt in my mind in response to something I was feeling)
Some loose/quick/initial thoughts on space...
I resonate with spaces where I, and the people who are present with me in it, feel safe and empowered to improvise
Where "improvise" in this context means the ability to notice new information, without judgement, and make choices that they think cohere with what the people who share in the space are present to create.
There is a clear and shared objective for what we are trying to make (defined in the broadest of terms)
I trust that others will check whether they’ve understood what I’ve said in the way I intended it
I trust that I will have an opportunity to repair harm if/when I cause it
I trust that I will be seen for what I know and have experienced
I trust I will be listened to
I trust that others will assume I am acting in good faith
I know that we have practices/traditions in places to remember the choices we make and why
I enjoy playing the role of someone who:
Creating the conditions necessary for the group to decide what they will commit to making and why
Supplies the group with the clarity they need to deploy the expertise they've developed.
Where "deploy" could mean things like: assessing risk, creating an artifact, determining whether a piece of new information is notable enough to be shared with the rest of the group
And so to me, that obviously "imprecise" thought lies hanging.
Although, now that I've gotten here, I'm thinking to myself, "Well, why not try recording a follow-up sketch. Alternatively, if/when there becomes a point when you do this kind of sketching publicly, perhaps that gap between what you meant to communicate and what you did communicate could be the invitation someone else needs to feel motivated, welcomed, and safe to participate in the conversation?"
I value it when a space, person, etc. invites me to say aloud something for the first time.
I've tried using voice memos to express how I'm feeling twice now (ordinarily, I'd reach for writing in these moments).
I have not yet felt satisfied with voice for expressing this kind of feeling/thought. In part (I think) because voice feels too fast for me.
The medium moves at the speed of my voice which is helpful for "getting something down" before it escapes me. Tho, often too fast for me to process how I'm feeling.
I'm not able to write (or more accurately, type) as quickly as I can think. In this context, I find it helpful to be slowed down...to fix typos...to take a moment to re-read the sentence I just wrote before proceeding on...to sigh.
When I start the process of thinking about something I need to do (e.g. a conversation I need to lead, a decision I need to make, a set of slides I need to produce, etc.) that is not yet clearly "scoped" in my mind, I'll usually create a new section in my "scratch" file.
I'll title that section the name of the thing I'm needing to do and within it, add a few, standard sub-sections. [i]
Lately, when thinking about doing something that I'm less practiced with, I've started adding a new section titled, "Reminders."
Within this section, I'll place things, that well, I find myself needing to be reminded of in order to "embody" the space the thinking I need to do exists within.
Doing the above feels new for me and I found the reminders (see screenshot below) effective for inspiring me to "keep going" in moments when uncertainty tempts me to stop.
---
i. The "standard sub-sections" I add are:
Objective
"What impact is/are the actions I am trying to define an effort to accomplish? For who?"
Decision(s) to be made
If the outcome of this thinking is me making a decision: "How can I articulate the decision(s) in a way that makes it clear what this decision will, and crucially, will NOT impact?"
Open Questions
"What questions are emerge as I inhabit the space of this challenge/objective/etc.?
The path here started with journaling. Overwhelmed with thought, I turned to writing to "move through" what I was feeling. With time, journaling equipped me with new capacity and tools to "hold" more and "let go" more easily. It also summed into a body of self-knowledge I've drawn on to make choices of all kinds that continue to shape the experiences and impact I [attempt to] have here.
It feels good to say these words – "journaling" and "self-knowledge" – aloud again; they feel true, solid, capable of being build upon.
I've felt far away from this language and I'm grateful for Ashley, Kyle, and Obi for bringing me back to it. I feel at home in them and I'm eager to invite more people in using them.
I like how conceiving of questions/prompts as doorways draws my attention to the responsibility that questions/prompts have for earning the trust of the person receiving them and evaluating the extent to which they'll engage with them.
This leads me to a question that's something like: "What could cause people to feel more trusting of, and willing to engage with, a question that doesn't immediately resonate with them?"
That phrasing doesn't quite capture it, but it's a start.
Speaking of micro-syntax, I've developed a habit of using quotation marks (" " ) as a way of communicating to myself, and ideally other people, that a particular word or metaphor I'm using is a sketch, not yet something I have conviction in.
I find that doing the above helps break me out of the "find the ideal" language loop I can find myself getting stuck in when trying to externalize a nascent thought.
Where "reflex" could be a moment when I feel, say, unseen, hurt, sad, etc.
The idea here being these reflexes are likely related by a perceived unmet need, value, etc.
Aside: I feel inclined to create a page titled something like "Thoughts." I'm imagining I'd use this page initially for: A) defining "thought types" and B) defining what I mean when I say "thought" considering how central that concept is to this practice.
I have gotten into a habit of prefixing some things I say to myself (and other people in certain contexts) with a term bounded by square brackets. So, things like:[question], [prompt], [idea], [ask] etc.
And I'd like to draw a quick sketch for why I think this might be the case:
Stability/Durability. Questions, prompts, ideas, etc. are relatively stable and distinct concepts/categories of thoughts in my mind. Experience has demonstrated to me that my current and future selves are likely to have a shared understanding for what does and does not qualify as a question, prompt, idea, etc.
In this way, using a tag as stable as [question] makes it possible for me to easily assemble a set of related thoughts across time. This helps make answering big, and generative, questions like "What have I been wondering about over the past few weeks?" or "What might I write about it? Why don't I see what [writing ideas] I've thought about in the past couple of weeks" pretty easy to ask and answer.
Applicability. Questions, prompts, and ideas, have clear use cases in my life. In this way, being able to more easily locate them across the various tools where I accrue them creates a great deal of possibility for me.
Legibility. Just like the presence of a question mark (?) makes it clear to people what a thought is seeking, prefixing a thought with bracketed thought type - I think – makes it easier for people to understand what it is a particular thought is trying to say to them.
For context, I felt compelled to write all of this after noticing myself using the [prompt] construct in a new context: within a "Book Note" for Thought As A System.
I think I considered this notable because seeing myself using this pattern in a new context without thinking about led me to think something like, "Huh, this pattern seems become useful enough to be something I'm "bringing with me" wherever I "go."
Aside: I'm reluctant to categorize the above as "tags" per se, but I think that's just because I have negative associations with a particular implementation of tags which I appreciate to be a far more open-ended concept. Maybe it would be worthwhile to talk about tags some more and why I think the implementations I've seen have done little to guide me to use them in ways that make it easier for my future selves to find what they are looking for later. Think: topical and the moments tools often present people with the opportunities to apply them.
I think it would be neat if the tool could support me sending pings (see below) to the tools I'd like to act on them within.
The above leads me to wonder whether there's something to this idea of being able to create some kind of "meta" area around the workspaces I frequent.
Thinking: these activity spaces would become more generative and richer, and the ideas within them would become stronger, if I could more easily draw on relevant thoughts/ideas while I'm working within them. I also wonder whether having the ability to "send" pings to these spaces without having to visit them would help me advance ideas more quickly because I will have better recall of the range of tools available to me at any given time.
Wow. This place feels great to be in...I'm having fun ^ _ ^ Thank you for the metaphor, Laurel!
I think I'm going to constrain this stream to thoughts related to thoughts related to working with information.
The above had been pretty much implicit in my mind, but sometimes I find it helpful to explicitly say or write out things out to reinforce them.
In the moment just before arriving here, I was feeling excited as I thought about all of the things I wanted to talked about from today.
Now, I'm here. I'm not writing in DailyNotes, I'm not writing in Twitter, I'm not in Messages, and I'm not drafting an email. I could see each of the topics I was wanting to write about being a fit for these different places, but I couldn't see a single place where they'd all fit.
That little question – "Where should I put this?" – was enough to interrupt the flow I felt. I think that's all what I'm wanting to name for now: the blocking force of this choice and the ease with which it can resurface.
I think writing out loose thoughts has helped me to become more effective at spontaneously synthesizing what I'm thinking in feeling in conversations, meetings, etc.
In this way, I think I'm starting to feel more confident in my ability to improvise.
We seem to have that is somewhat effective at helping people recognize "Pings" amongst the range of thoughts/feelings they experience.
At the same time, a question , , Ell, , and identified remains answered: What form does a Ping take on in the context, of say, we're building? [i] Further, how might a Ping standout in relation to other digital formats/contexts? [ii]
A ping needs to be medium agnostic so that you feel empowered to capture a Ping in a way that feels most and expressive of the moment you're capturing it within.
helpfully posed a question some weeks ago that I remember as something like, "What might it look like to look at Pings at various zoom levels?"
Although, as , , and have identified, it's not yet clear to what extent – if any – Ping Practice (the app/tool) offers the affordances people need to be inspired and equipped to compile/create/converge on these meaningful artifacts.
I think it's important to arrive at a clear opinion on the above – regardless of what that opinion is – because I think these artifacts are fundamental to addressing the Ping Practice is an effort to meet.
Last night, a Ping of this sort surfaced, "I'm creating from a place. I'm not creating to get to a place." This Ping, combined with a series of Pings before it, d and clear and how I might go about nurturing .
The is helping some. Seeing the "🟢 Active" email arrive each day has caused the space itself to become more top of mind, but I've yet to find myself going into Airtable and asking myself, "Which of these are still relevant for today? Which is relevant for today that might not currently be represented?" and acting on the answers.
I think I was immediately attracted to the potential of because I've noticed myself not revisiting the intentions within the "🟢 Active" view consistently. As a result, when I do revisit the view, I find the pings that are there stale/no longer as resonant or relevant. I wonder if the view itself being more present in my mind might cause me to more actively tend to and use the space for what I originally needed it for: to help me remember the intentions I'm trying to embody.
I have more to say here, but the important thing to me in this moment is the freedom from thinking that it is me who is breaking. It is not me. It is the tools themselves and I need more from them.
context:
I notice enabling/prompting/affording me the ability to do : "present peter" within the fleeting moments where has sensed opportunities to apply them.
Note: the two scearios I'm describing above already happens to me at work with It usually goes like this... We'll start work on a range of tickets. There will be some subset of these tickets that I/we reference more often than others. As this happens, I start to memorize the numbers of these tickets. And then, because I've memorized these ticket numbers, I end up referencing these tickets in conversation and in my own thinking/writing more often. In doing so, I end up revisiting these tickets to contribute new information (no matter how small) and refine what's already there. I also link to these tickets in the new tickets I create and comments I write elsewhere.
To ready myself for this sensemaking, I created a view of what I'd dropped in my journal over the past seven days and brought up the 04.30.md note within my alongside it. Raw material and a surface to sort through it.
Reflecting on the above brought me back to what Obi shared during the . Obi shared that when he arrives in the studio for a recording session, he'll often pull up his Apple Notes to review what he's been thinking about to see if anything there inspires/moves him to make music to.
See:
Just now, I was . In the process, I noticed myself making a choice not to use a possessive pronoun. In making this choice, I thought to myself, "Oh this would be a good convention/pattern to name in the I started."
Next, I opened up are.na and I started to describe/bring shape to this convention. A few moments in, I noticed myself getting stuck, not locating the words I felt like I needed to express the idea that prompted me to visit are.na in the first place.
I finished similar to how I remember myself .
This led me to experience, and subsequently , the utility of offering people an easy way to see what they've said on days/time that are similar to the moments they currently find themselves to be in and/or curious about.
So, I . Not too long after, I started talking about something else.
It's important that make capturing a voice memo as easy as snapping a photo. This way, people feel inclined to act on those little instincts to capture something which could lead to some larger expression.
Tonight, related to how I've been experimenting with .
To capture this new facet, I immediately so that I could let the thought go and return to cooking dinner.
I and yet, I didn't feel the sense of satisfaction and clarity that writing has delivered in the past and that I was seeking in this moment.
I feel empowered to participate in a space when ():
I miss the ability to edit/iterate upon what I've said. Example: tonight I sketched . Upon finishing, I thought, "Hold on, I don't feel like 'creating space' quite captures what I'm trying to express here. I think what I'm trying to expresss is closer to, 'I am drawn to co-creating space with other people in service of making an impact together.'" I suppose I could've recorded another sketch, but for a reason I have not yet named, I didn't.
This happened during : I appreciate prompts that are proximate and clear enough that I can immediately pick them up/reach for them and in doing so, be moved to see something that feels new, fresh...something I might not have seen otherwise.
For example, in the moments before writing this, I was sketching out what it might look like to send an email at some cadence that serves as invitation for people into the work I'm doing to refine and actualize .
I'm attracted to describing the personal classifiers I talked about on and as a kind of "micro-syntax" or way of declaring or codifying types of thought in an explicit enough way that I "operate" on them at some later point.
Building on the idea of , I wonder if there could be meaning in experimenting with using a[reflex] thought type.
Sketches of what information I imagine Ping Practice to hold and how it will flow within the site.
🟢 Active view as of 11 May 2023.